[Image description: Four exhausted middle-aged radical professors gather to protest genocide and scholasticide and illegal deportation and kidnapping students and who can even count, anymore, all the things we’re protesting, really?]
Today, my students organized an intersectional feminist march as part of a coordinated day of action against the fascist takeover of American higher education. These are the remarks I delivered.
Hi everybody. Thank you for coming out today. I’m Emily Van Duyne, and for the last eleven years, my classes have helped to put on marches like this as part of their activism projects for Women, Gender, and Sexuality, every spring. When I started teaching this course, I was 34-years old, and barely two years out of a violent marriage in which I survived domestic violence and sexual assault. I never intended for my own survival to become part of how I taught about sexual assault, but it did. My students granted me credibility because I was a survivor; they listened to me, and then, they talked back. They told me their rape stories, their survival stories, which we used as a way to collectively resist a culture that increasingly celebrated sexual violence against women, a culture that elected president–twice, now– a man credibly accused of rape by multiple women, including his ex-wife.
It was empowering to do that work with my students, during the first Trump presidency. But it was also negligent, on my part. I took for granted that my whiteness allowed me to speak publicly as a rape survivor, a role this country has only ever granted to white women, especially middle-class, highly educated white women. In my classrooms, and at marches like this, I emphasized the importance of reclaiming the story of your rape and sexual assault in writing and public speech. But I neglected the reality that I could do this, if not with impunity, then at least with the protection of my race and class. This is borne out of the American history of rape, one in which, to quote the great anti-lynching activist and reporter Ida B. Wells-Barnett, “for certain crimes and alleged crimes, no negro shall be allowed a trial; that no white woman shall be compelled to charge an assault under oath or to submit any such charge to the investigation of a court of law.” In other words, if a white woman accused a Black man of rape in the United States, he could be lynched without a trial. This was the “unwritten law,” that was, said Wells-Barnett, “considered necessary to prevent crimes against [white] women.”
This is the legacy of rape in the United States. To shield ourselves from the horror and shame of centuries of the systemic rape of enslaved women by the white men who claimed to own them, we invented a bogeyman, Black men who threatened the precious chastity of white women. The most famous example of this is the 1955 lynching of 14-year old Emmett Till, after a white woman named Caroline Bryant claimed he whistled at her in a grocery store; Bryant’s husband and his half-brother kidnapped and murdered Till that same night, and were acquitted of the crime in a jury trial, during which the all-white jurors were allowed to drink beer on duty and white spectators openly carried handguns.
This is the same racist, shallow playbook which is now being used to justify and excuse and perpetuate a genocide against the Palestinian people, for nineteen months, with no end in sight. All of you have surely heard the allegations of sexual violence against Israelis that occurred during the October 7 Hamas attack. And many of you surely saw the widespread clip of Pramila Patten, the United Nations’ Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict, reporting to the Security Counsel after visiting the October 7 attack sites that, indeed, “What I witnessed in Israel were scenes of unspeakable violence perpetrated with shocking brutality,” including sexual violence.
Of course you saw it. The clip was on every major news media outlet, playing on repeat. Case closed, the western media seemed to say. Members of Hamas raped Israeli womem, and so, all of Palestine must suffer endlessly to protect the chastity of Israeli women from even the specter of rape.
No matter, I guess, that Pramila Patten went on to say, “I am horrified by the… injustice in Gaza,” that she was there to call not for a “war without rape,” but a “world without war,” an immediate ceasefire. No matter that, in the ensuing discussion by the Security Council, the representative from Algeria noted that, since 2001, Palestinians and other members of the Security Council have lodged 1400 complaints of torture, including sexual violence, against Israel, which have led to– count them!-- a total of three investigations. No matter that Pramila Patten, when she turned her discussion From October 7 to Gaza, spoke definitively of “Israeli forces’ sexual violence in the context of detention, such as invasive body searches; beatings, including in the genital areas; and threats of rape against women and female family members. Sexual harassment and threats of rape during house raids and at checkpoints were also reported. Patten expressed disappointment that the immediate reaction to her report by some Israeli political actors was not to open inquiries into those alleged incidents but, rather, to reject them outright via social media.”
And no matter that the Israeli occupation of Palestine, which is presently in its 78th and deadliest year, yet, resembles nothing so much as American terrorism against Blacks, by lynching, in the Jim Crow south, of which Ida B. Barnett-Wells said, “The sentiment of [America] has been appealed to, in describing the isolated conditions of white families, in thickly populated negro districts; and the charge is made that these homes are in as great danger as if they are surrounded by wild beasts. And the world has accepted this theory without let or hindrance. In many cases there has been open expression that the fate meted out to the victim was only what he deserved. In many other instances there has been a silence that says more forcibly than words can proclaim,” that the lynching and burning alive of innocent human beings in the name of white women’s chastity is more than acceptable, it is just. This is the same argument, a century later, that Israel, and America, make about Palestinians, daily. What else is this genocide, in the end, but a mass and endless lynching?
So I stand here today as a survivor of sexual violence to say, no. We refuse the wholesale exploitation of sexual trauma in the name of an Israeli genocide paid for with US dollars, with our tax dollars. You cannot have the money I make by teaching about rape to use rape as an excuse to burn Palestinians alive with US bombs. We call out the systemic use of sexual harassment and rape by the Israeli occupation against all Palestinians as an ongoing tool of colonial occupation and apartheid, one America quite literally wrote the book on. We say– say it with me– never again to anyone. Never again is now. Thank you.
You have got to be kidding. "Members of Hamas raped Israeli womem, and so, all of Palestine must suffer endlessly to protect the chastity of Israeli women from even the specter of rape." Nothing to say about Hamas killing those women also, and their livestreaming the rapes and killings? Nothing to say about Hamas taking elderly women and children hostage, including a 9 month old baby and his 4 year brother? And then killing them? And then parading their bodies in front of a sign blaming Israel for their deaths, and showing Netanyahu as a vampire? And nothing about Hamas saying they were also returning the body of their mother, but it turned out not to be their mother Shiri Bibas, but a unidentified woman who wasn't related to them, as DNA tests revealed?
Hamas killed 1200 people including women like Shani Nicole Louk whose body was taken to Gaza as a trophy to be spat on. Hamas booby trapped the bodies of some of the women they killed and mutilated so Israelis trying to recover them would be blown up and killed.
Israel is only doing what any other country would do after being invaded and after their citizens were brutally killed. Israel is fighting to free the hostages. Many of the hostages have testified that they were raped and tortured.
I don't understand your reasoning that Israel is wrong for fighting Hamas after Hamas killed and raped thousands and took others hostage- and I don't understand your not supporting any of the women who survived being raped and tortured by Hamas.
"And no matter that the Israeli occupation of Palestine, which is presently in its 78th and deadliest year, yet, resembles nothing so much as American terrorism against Blacks, by lynching, in the Jim Crow south" Gaza wasn't occupied on October 7. Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005. It's self governing, governed by Hamas. Egypt also blockades Gaza, for the same reasons Israel does: to keep weapons out of Gaza and to protect their citizens from terrorist attacks (Hamas has also attacked Egypt and killed Egyptians). Strangely I see few people condemn Egypt for blockading Gaza, for not allowing more Palestinians to enter Egypt through its border crossing at Rafah, and for not sending more aid. Is that because Egyptians are also brown and Muslim? Is that because accusing Egypt of carrying out Jim Crow terrorism and oppression doesn't have the same charge as a comparison, because people don't think of Egyptians as white "Europeans" or "colonizers" who lynch? Actually Hamas lynched on camera a Tanzanian student who they took hostage and forced into Gaza. Where's your outrage about that?
"Protect all women" unless they're Jewish? "Never Again for Everyone" except Israelis?
By the way, if a woman is raped by someone who isn't white do you think it's racist for her to speak out?
Remember Pearl Harbor? The US declared war on Japan after Japan's attack killed 2,403 people. An argument can be made regarding the morality of the US' war on Japan, as 550,000 to 800,000 Japanese civilians were killed, including 150,000 to 246,000 in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
My comments yesterday were emotional (I'm sorry about this, I should have used reasoned argument in a more dispassionate tone) , but I want you to understand that for Americans who lost family and loved ones who were fighting for their country, it is upsetting to read that America uses rape as a tool of war. Especially people of color who lost loved ones and family who served in the armed forces. America fought Japan to free the countries and peoples who were under the oppression of the brutal Japan occupation. Japan forced between 50,000 and 200,000 Korean women into sexual servitude as "comfort women". Imagine Korean American women reading that America uses rape in war which stems from the history of racism against African Americans. They would feel upset that the trauma of Japan's sexually enslaving Koreans was being excluded, the racism of Japanese against Koreans was being erased, and rape was being weaponized to attack Americans. I'm aware that there were instances of American soldiers raping women during WWII and Iraq (I heard about some instances personally talking to relatives who were MPs in WWII). The soldiers who committed them were court-martialed and disciplined. Rape was not official US policy for the armed forces, and cases of American soldiers committing rape were few compared to the massive numbers of rapes carried out by the Soviet Army as the Russians battled Germany.
It is not official policy of the IDF to rape Palestinians. In fact, a published academic paper by Tal Nitzan stated that the Israelis don't rape Palestinian women because they are "racist" (http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/124674) A journalist commented, "Such that this situation is unique: An army is found blameworthy of rape, and is also blameworthy of not raping."
I want you to understand how upsetting it is for many people for Israel to be denounced for rape, not only in the light of condemnations of Israel for not raping Palestinian women because they're too racist to see Palestinian women as human, but also in regards to the denial that Hamas raped and killed women on October 7, and raped and killed hostages. It's not only painful for the relatives and families of women who were killed on October 7, and the relatives and families of the hostages, it's distressing when Hamas' rapes and atrocities are simultaneously ignored. Many people are demanding that Hamas be held to account rather than being excused. Many people are furious about Judith Butler and others refusing to condemn Hamas for rape, and accepting rape as method of war when committed by groups they support politically (https://fathomjournal.org/we-can-have-a-debate-about-whether-hamas-did-the-right-thing-judith-butlers-moral-relativism/)
The sign in the picture at the top of this page says "Protect All Women". Imagine being excluded from other women and considered not worth protecting, because of your religion, ethnicity, or politics. Imagine that at the same time people of your religion, ethnicity, or political views are dismissed as rape victims, despite extensive documented evidence of them being raped and murdered, and are incriminated en masse as rapists and murderers. Moreover while your people have been killed by a terrorist group and are being held hostage and tortured by that terrorist groups.